From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chacin v. Generali Assicurazioni

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 28, 1995
655 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Summary

holding that attorney's fees are awardable against surplus-lines insurers under section 627.428

Summary of this case from Essex Insurance Co. v. Zota

Opinion

No. 95-552.

May 3, 1995. Rehearing Denied June 28, 1995.

Petition from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Appellate Division, Philip Bloom, Steven Levine, Barbara Levenson, JJ.

Carlos Lidsky and Charles L. Vaccaro, for petitioner.

Kroll Tract and Nicolas G. Sakellis and Hyman Hillenbrand, for respondent.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and COPE, JJ.


The appellate division of the circuit court affirmed the county court's denial of the plaintiff-insured's application for attorney's fees under section 627.428, Florida Statutes (1993) on the ground that section 626.912, Florida Statutes (1993) "precludes the award of attorney [sic] fees against a surplus lines insurer" like the carrier involved in this case. We quash the decision and mandate reversal of the county court on the authority of English American Insurance Co. v. Swain Groves, Inc., 218 So.2d 453 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969), which is squarely in point and with which we agree:

The final question involved the propriety of the award of attorney's fees where the non-admitted carriers complied with Section 626.0509, F.S. 1965, F.S.A. [now § 626.912, Fla. Stat. (1993)]. Appellants [sic] argument is that an attorney's fee is allowed in an action against an unauthorized foreign insurer only under the provisions of Section 626.0508, F.S. 1965, F.S.A., [now § 626.911, Fla. Stat. (1993)] but that Section 626.0509 F.S. 1965, F.S.A. specifically exempts therefrom an action against an unauthorized insurer arising out of a contract of insurance issued under the surplus lines law under certain conditions [which existed in the instant case]. We pretermit a determination of whether appellants were exempt from Section 626.0508, F.S. 1965 by holding that the appellants were within the scope of Section 627.0127, F.S. 1965, F.S.A., [now § 627.428, Fla. Stat. (1993)] [which provides for the award of attorney's fees upon rendition of a judgment against an insurer in favor of an insured].
English Am. Ins. Co., 218 So.2d at 458.

Certiorari granted.

NESBITT, J., concurs.


I join the majority opinion and would add that in my view this result also follows from the terms of section 626.925, Florida Statutes (1993).


Summaries of

Chacin v. Generali Assicurazioni

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 28, 1995
655 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

holding that attorney's fees are awardable against surplus-lines insurers under section 627.428

Summary of this case from Essex Insurance Co. v. Zota

In Chacin, the court did not exclusively cite the decision in English, but made specific mention of the relevant statutes in their amended form.

Summary of this case from Essex Insurance v. Zota

relying on the 4th DCA's decision in English to hold that Fla. Stat. § 627.428 applies to surplus line insurers

Summary of this case from Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Osting-Schwinn
Case details for

Chacin v. Generali Assicurazioni

Case Details

Full title:GONZALO A. CHACIN, PETITIONER, v. GENERALI ASSICURAZIONI GENERALI SPA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 28, 1995

Citations

655 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Osting-Schwinn

Surplus line insurers may be exempt from certain statutory provisions. See Essex Ins. Co. v. Zota, 466 F.3d…

Essex Insurance Co. v. Zota

See 511 So.2d at 969-71; ch. 88-166 Staff Analysis at 4. The correct interpretation is that the exclusionary…