Opinion
JUNE 3, 2002
No. 01-269 CREO PRODUCTS INC. v. DAINIPPON SCREEN MANUFACTURING CO., LTD., ET AL. C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., ante, p. 722. Reported below: 10 Fed. Appx. 921.
No. 01-423 SEMITOOL, INC. v. NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., ante, p. 722. Reported below: 12 Fed. Appx. 918.
No. 01-506 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP. v. SPACE SYSTEMS/LORAL, INC. C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., ante, p. 722. Reported below: 249 F.3d 1314.
No. 01-541 ACCUSCAN, INC. v. XEROX CORP. C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., ante, p. 722. JUSTICE BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Reported below: 18 Fed. Appx. 828.
No. 01-677 PTI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. PALL CORPORATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for futher consideration in light of Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., ante, p. 722. Reported below: 259 F.3d 1383.
No. 01-711 BELL, WARDEN v. QUINTERO. C.A. 6th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Bell v. Cone, ante, p. 685. Reported below: 256 F.3d 409.
No. 01-740 MYCOGEN PLANT SCIENCE, INC., ET AL v. MONSANTO CO. C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for futher consideration in light of Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., ante, p. 722. Reported below: 252 F.3d 1306.
No. 01-1413 JONES, WARDEN v. FRENCH. C.A. 6th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Bell v. Cone, ante, p. 685. Reported below: 282 F.3d 893.
No. 01-9439 SAFOUANE ET UX. v. FLECK ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8.
No. 01-9451 MULAZIM v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) ( per curiam). JUSTICE STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein. Reported below: 28 Fed. Appx. 470.