Summary
noting that "[beginning with the rule at issue in Teague, the Court has measured at least eleven new rules, or proposed new rules, of criminal procedure against the criteria for the second exception and, in every case, has refused to apply the rule at issue retroactively"
Summary of this case from Peed v. HillOpinion
JUNE 28, 2002
No. 01-1737 AIELLO v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 01-1747 WEAVER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 275 F.3d 1320.
No. 01-1750 MANDANICI v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 205 F.3d 519.
No. 01-1751 METT ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 274 F.3d 1235.
No. 01-1769 WAYNE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 01-1777 McGONEGAL v. OHIO. Ct. App. Ohio, Montgomery County. Certiorari denied.
No. 01-1781 NAJJOR v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 255 F.3d 979.
No. 01-5169 RODGERS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 245 F.3d 961.
No. 01-5305 PITCHER v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 7 Fed. Appx. 119.
No. 01-5346 BAILEY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 7 Fed. Appx. 274.
No. 01-5481 WHITE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 2 Fed. Appx. 671.
No. 01-5501 KIJEWSKI v. FLORIDA. Dist.Ct.App. Fla., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 773 So.2d 124.
No. 01-5526 HALL v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 8 Fed. Appx. 529.
No. 01-5718 PHILLIPS, AKA DUKE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 254 F.3d 73.
No. 01-5820 PICKENS v. OKLAHOMA. Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 19 P.3d 866.
No. 01-5844 PETTUS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 11 Fed. Appx. 112.