From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 29, 2001
534 U.S. 1011 (2001)

Summary

holding Apprendi concerns are not implicated by consecutive sentencing

Summary of this case from Hall v. State

Opinion

OCTOBER 29, 2001


No. 01-6493 PARRA-TELLEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 253 F.3d 703.

No. 01-6494 PIPKIN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 15 Fed. Appx. 46.

No. 01-6497 TALLEY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 15 Fed. Appx. 215.

No. 01-6500 WAGENER v. ILLINOIS. Sup.Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 196 Ill.2d 269, 752 N.E.2d 430.

No. 01-6501 WITHERS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 12 Fed. Appx. 183.

No. 01-6502 STOKELY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 264 F.3d 1147.

No. 01-6503 RODRIGUEZ-OSORIO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 13 Fed. Appx. 529.

No. 01-6504 PRATT v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 16 Fed. Appx. 874.

No. 01-6505 SANTOS-RIOS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 13 Fed. Appx. 529.

No. 01-6506 STUCKEY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 255 F.3d 528.

No. 01-6508 CARRAWAY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6510 BETANCOURT-SANCHEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 263 F.3d 165.

No. 01-6513 REYNOLDS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 250 F.3d 740.

No. 01-6515 GUERRA-FION, AKA GUERRA-RION v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 13 Fed. Appx. 608.

No. 01-6516 MILLER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 19 Fed. Appx. 30.

No. 01-6519 THORNTON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 248 F.3d 1182.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 29, 2001
534 U.S. 1011 (2001)

holding Apprendi concerns are not implicated by consecutive sentencing

Summary of this case from Hall v. State
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 29, 2001

Citations

534 U.S. 1011 (2001)
122 S. Ct. 498

Citing Cases

State v. Tanner

The Illinois Supreme Court likewise found no constitutional flaw in a consecutive sentencing scheme that…

State v. Keene

[¶ 26] Specifically addressing Maine law, we find no basis for applying Apprendi and its progeny to the…