From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jan 7, 2002
534 U.S. 1079 (2002)

Summary

recognizing that “analysis of an expectation of privacy following entrustment to a third party might be different under art. 14”

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Augustine

Opinion

JANUARY 7, 2002


No. 01-543. GLOBAL NAPS, INC. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL. C.A. D.C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 247 F.3d 252

No. 01-548. SOCIETA COOPERATIVA L'ARCIER v. KOPKE ET AL. Sup.Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 245 Wis.2d 396, 629 N.W.2d 662.

No. 01-562. WISE v. FRYAR. Ct. App. Tex., 11th Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 49 S.W.3d 450.

No. 01-563. CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND ET AL. v. BASIC AMERICAN INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 252 F.3d 911.

No. 01-568. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO v. FITZWATER. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 9 Fed. Appx. 695.

No. 01-569. LYON ET AL. v. AGUSTA S.P.A. ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 252 F.3d 1078.

No. 01-573. KENTUCKY RETIREMENT SYSTEMS ET AL. v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 16 Fed. Appx. 443.

No. 01-587. LEMAIRE ET AL. v. DANOS CUROLE MARINE CONTRACTORS, INC. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 265 F.3d 1059.

No. 01-596. CITY OF TACOMA ET AL. v. QWEST CORP. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 260 F.3d 1160.

No. 01-603. DELUXE CORP. v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA. Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-615. MAHARG, INC. v. VAN WERT SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 249 F.3d 544

No. 01-616. BUCCELLA v. MASSACHUSETTS. Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 434 Mass. 473, 751 N.E.2d 373.

No. 01-617. BARNETT v. FARMON, WARDEN. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

534 U.S. 1077


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jan 7, 2002
534 U.S. 1079 (2002)

recognizing that “analysis of an expectation of privacy following entrustment to a third party might be different under art. 14”

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Augustine
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 7, 2002

Citations

534 U.S. 1079 (2002)

Citing Cases

In re Subpoena

Although we previously said that "[i]t would appear reasonable to expect that a government agency, to which a…

Commonwealth v. Zachary Z.

The motion judge allowed the juvenile's motion to suppress the identification. Based on his assumption that…