From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Mar 25, 2002
535 U.S. 956 (2002)

Opinion

MARCH 25, 2002


No. 01-7775 AYALA v. COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7784 MAYES v. ROWLEY, SUPERINTENDENT, NORTHEAST CORRECTIONAL CENTER. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7789 RENWICK v. COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7791 NABELEK v. SCOTT, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 273 F.3d 392.

No. 01-7794 MADDEN v. REISH. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 276 F.3d 578.

No. 01-7798 RODGERS v. JOHNSON, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT PITTSBURGH. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7800 JONES v. CALIFORNIA. Sup.Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7803 DUNCAN v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 15 Fed. Appx. 730.

No. 01-7806 MERCK v. MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7807 BROOKS v. ANGELONE, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 14 Fed. Appx. 228.

No. 01-7810 PEHOWIC v. NEW HAMPSHIRE. Sup.Ct. N.H. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 147 N.H. 52, 780 A.2d 1289.

No. 01-7813 BURGINS v. ALABAMA. Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7814 TINKER v. HANKS, SUPERINTENDENT, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 255 F.3d 444.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Mar 25, 2002
535 U.S. 956 (2002)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 25, 2002

Citations

535 U.S. 956 (2002)

Citing Cases

Pursley v. Estep

That decision was vacated by the United States Supreme Court in light of the decision in Artuz v. Bennet,…

U.S. v. Truesdale

Prisoners do not have an absolute and unconditional right of access to the courts in order to prosecute…