From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jun 9, 2003
539 U.S. 919 (2003)

Summary

holding admission of victim's prior PFA petitions against appellant was proper to demonstrate continual and escalating nature of appellant's abuse of victim

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. McCray

Opinion

JUNE 9, 2003.


No. 02-10018. CARTER v. MICHIGAN. Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10027. OLIVER v. GREINER, SUPERINTENDENT, GREEN HAVEN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10048. PAGAN v. FLORIDA. Sup.Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 830 So.2d 792.

No. 02-10071. DRUMHELLER v. PENNSYLVANIA. Sup.Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 570 Pa. 117, 808 A.2d 893.

No. 02-10076. WILSON v. CAIN, WARDEN. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10090. MATHIS v. VARNER, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT DALLAS. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10103. MICKEY v. NORTH CAROLINA. Gen. Ct. Justice, Super. Ct. Div., Randolph County, N.C. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10156. BOWMAN v. DRAGOVICH, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT CAMP HILL, ET AL. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10166. DE URIOSTE v. FINN, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 53 Fed. Appx. 439.

No. 02-10182. DRAYTON v. KYLER, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT HUNTINGDON, ET AL. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10193. AGRAMONTE v. WALSH, SUPERINTENDENT, SULLIVAN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10194. ANDERSON v. VAUGHN, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT GRATERFORD, ET AL. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10206. MURRAY v. JOHNSON, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT PITTSBURGH, ET AL. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jun 9, 2003
539 U.S. 919 (2003)

holding admission of victim's prior PFA petitions against appellant was proper to demonstrate continual and escalating nature of appellant's abuse of victim

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. McCray

holding that the trial court did not clearly abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of four PFA orders obtained by victim against defendant, the earliest of which dated back thirty-four months, in a first-degree murder case. Evidence properly used to demonstrate the chain or sequence of events that formed the history of the case and Defendant's motive, malice, intent, and ill-will

Summary of this case from Com. v. Melendez-Rodriguez
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 9, 2003

Citations

539 U.S. 919 (2003)

Citing Cases

Troy v. State

In reviewing a motion for judgment of acquittal, a de novo standard of review applies. See Pagan v. State,…

Troy v. Sec'y of Dep't of Corr.

In reviewing a motion for judgment of acquittal, a de novo standard of review applies. See Pagan v. State,…