From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 2, 2000
531 U.S. 919 (2000)

Summary

holding that an order that failed to specify which of two state procedural rules applied to petitioner's claims could not procedurally bar a federal habeas petition if either of the rules was either not adequate or not independent

Summary of this case from Davis v. Malfi

Opinion

OCTOBER 2, 2000


00-149 McKENZIE ET AL. v. REHNQUIST, CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. C.A.D.C. CIR. Certiorari denied. THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below. 203 F.3d 52.

99-10242 GLINSEY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioner to consolidate this case with No. 99-1687, Bartnicki et v. Vopper, aka Williams, et al. [certiorari granted, 530 U.S. 1260], and No. 99-1728, United States v. Vopper, aka Williams, et al. [certiorari granted, 530 U.S. 1260], denied. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 209 F.3d 386.

00-50 R. E. W. vs. C.A. M., ET AL. App. Ct. Mass. Motion of petitioner for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 48 Mass. App. Ct. 1117, 722 N.E.2d 1011.

00-111 LOE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted. Certiorari denied.

00-86 KERSTETTER v. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC CO. ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 210 F.3d 431.

00-150 CALIFORNIA ET AL. v. WASHINGTON. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 208 F.3d 832.

00-5395 FORDJOUR v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION. Ct. App. Ariz. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

00-90 EXXON MOBIL CORP. ET AL. v. BAKER ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. motion of petitioners to defer consideration of petition for writ of certiorari denied. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 206 F.3d 900.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 2, 2000
531 U.S. 919 (2000)

holding that an order that failed to specify which of two state procedural rules applied to petitioner's claims could not procedurally bar a federal habeas petition if either of the rules was either not adequate or not independent

Summary of this case from Davis v. Malfi

holding that an order that failed to specify which of two state procedural rules applied to petitioner's claims could not procedurally bar a federal habeas petition if either of the rules was either not adequate or not independent

Summary of this case from Davis v. Malfi

noting the defendant bears the burden of demonstrating that the information in the PSR is materially inaccurate, and if the defendant fails to carry his burden the court may adopt the PSR findings without further explanation

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Martinez
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 2, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 919 (2000)

Citing Cases

Woods v. Director of Corrections

Calderon v. District Court (Bean), 96 F.3d 1126, 1131 (9th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1204, 117 S.Ct.…

Williams v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr.

The voluntary plea waived Williams's antecedent non-jurisdictional grounds because the grounds do not…