From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jun 16, 2003
539 U.S. 931 (2003)

Opinion

JUNE 16, 2003.


No. 02-10133. GOWANS v. COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10135. HENRY v. JOHNSON, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT PITTSBURGH. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10136. HOWARD v. LOUISIANA. Ct. App. La., 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 810 So.2d 588.

No. 02-10137. HOCUTT v. COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10141. ISRAEL v. FLORIDA. Sup.Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 837 So.2d 381.

No. 02-10146. HUTCHINSON v. TEXAS. Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10150. CANTY v. CASON, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 56 Fed. Appx. 660.

No. 02-10152. KING v. COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 54 Fed. Appx. 798.

No. 02-10153. BOZMAN v. CITY OF ELYRIA, OHIO. Ct. App. Ohio, Lorain County. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10162. NIXON v. ELO, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10172. BRITT v. MICHIGAN. Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10183. DiSANTO v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10186. SWANKO v. WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 55 Fed. Appx. 902.

No. 02-10190. PANKOV v. PRECISION INTERCONNECT, A DIVISION OF LUDLOW CO., LP. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 56 Fed. Appx. 771.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jun 16, 2003
539 U.S. 931 (2003)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 16, 2003

Citations

539 U.S. 931 (2003)

Citing Cases

Windom v. State

5 (Anstead, C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); Allen, 854 So.2d at 1263 (concurring in part…

Tharp v. Eppinger

Tharp's claim of actual innocence is contradicted by his guilty plea to four counts in state court. See,…