From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 15, 2001
534 U.S. 976 (2001)

Opinion

OCTOBER 15, 2001


No. 01-5842 RAMOS v. COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-5847 SMITH v. GOMEZ. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 4 Fed. Appx. 460.

No. 01-5850 COMPO v. MOODY ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-5852 LYONS v. MISSOURI. Sup.Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 39 S.W.3d 32.

No. 01-5855 TAYLOR v. ADE ET UX. Ct. App. Kan. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 28 Kan. App. 2d 712, 21 P.3d 581.

No. 01-5857 PEREZ v. MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 252 F.3d 442.

No. 01-5862 SILVERA v. ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 244 F.3d 1253.

No. 01-5864 SANCHEZ v. COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-5870 BAEZ v. KNOWLES ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 252 F.3d 1360.

No. 01-5873 ZACHARIE v. LEWIS, WARDEN. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-5874 TOLLIVER v. McGRATH, WARDEN. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-5877 ZESSMAN v. NEVADA. Sup.Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-5879 WINDES v. TEXAS. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-5880 AGOR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT. Ct. App.D.C. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 15, 2001
534 U.S. 976 (2001)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 15, 2001

Citations

534 U.S. 976 (2001)

Citing Cases

U.S. EEOC v. Stock Building Supply, Inc.

"In order to meet the comparability requirement a plaintiff is required to show that he is similarly situated…

Thornton v. Birmingham Nursing & Rehab. Ctr. E., LLC

To show that the proffered reason for her termination was pretextual, Plaintiff must show that Defendant…