From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Mar 18, 2002
535 U.S. 932 (2002)

Opinion

MARCH 18, 2002


No. 01-1064 KELLOGG v. STRACK. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 269 F.3d 100.

No. 01-1076 FERNANDES v. SPARTA TOWNSHIP COUNCIL ET AL. Super. Ct. N.J. App. Div. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-1093 McMANUS v. CRAWFORD. Ct. App. Ariz. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-1105 LoCASCIO v. HUNTINGTON EYE ASSOCIATES, INC. Sup.Ct. App. W. Va. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 210 W. Va. 76, 553 S.E.2d 773.

No. 01-1123 OLICK v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITY DEALERS. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 275 F.3d 37.

No. 01-1143 ROCKEFELLER v. ABRAHAM, SECRETARY OF ENERGY. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 23 Fed. Appx. 893

No. 01-1153 THURNER ET UX. v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 21 Fed. Appx. 477.

No. 01-1161 CLUCK v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-1170 BENNETT v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 252 F.3d 559.

No. 01-1198 PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 22 Fed. Appx. 163.

No. 01-1203 EQBAL ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 27 Fed. Appx. 728.

No. 01-5359 DOE v. NOE ET AL. (two judgments). App. Ct. Ill., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 317 Ill. App.3d 419, 739 N.E.2d 1036 (first Judgment); 317 Ill. App.3d 445, 739 N.E.2d 1043 (second judgment).

No. 01-6151 REYES v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 260 F.3d 622.

No. 01-6475 McDOWELL v. FLORIDA. Sup.Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 789 So.2d 956.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Mar 18, 2002
535 U.S. 932 (2002)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 18, 2002

Citations

535 U.S. 932 (2002)
122 S. Ct. 1306

Citing Cases

Pressley v. Bennet

Report at 367-68. In reaching this conclusion, the Magistrate properly determined that: (i) Petitioner's…

Whitlatch v. Senkowski

In deciding whether a penalty is grossly disproportionate to the offense, the Supreme Court has indicated…