From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 2, 2000
531 U.S. 875 (2000)

Summary

finding that a plaintiff in an employment discrimination case must show that the employer's reasons for taking an employment action were dishonest or pretextual, not just dispute the merits of them

Summary of this case from Spriggs v. Public Service Commission of Maryland

Opinion

OCTOBER 2, 2000


00-77 LOUDON COUNTY ET AL. v. SOWARDS. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 203 F.3d 426.

00-78 LARA v. NEBRASKA. Sup.Ct. Neb. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 258 Neb. 996, 607 N.W.2d 487.

00-79 GODFREY v. PENNSYLVANIA. Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 737 A.2d 1273.

00-80 DRAKE OIL TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS ET AL. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 211 F.3d 1277.

00-81 PANGBURN v. NORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 210 F.3d 372.

00-82 CHABAFY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 219 F.3d 227.

00-83 CONTINI ET AL. v. SMITH. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 205 F.3d 597.

00-84 BURROUGHS, AS FATHER, NEXT FRIEND, AND GUARDIAN OF HIS MINOR CHILDREN, BURROUGHS ET AL. v. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROJECT ET AL. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 215 F.3d 1314.

00-85 MANSON v. LITTLE ROCK NEWSPAPERS, INC., DBA ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 205 F.3d 1172.

00-87 JACKSON v. LACHANCE, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 205 F.3d 1354.

00-88 FOLEY v. NEW YORK. Ct. App. N.Y. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 94 N.Y.2d 668, 731 N.E.2d 123.

00-91 BENNETT ET AL. v. BARNETT ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 210 F.3d 272.

00-92 HAWKINS v. PEPSICO, INC., DBA PEPSI-COLA NORTH AMERICA ET AL. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 203 F.3d 274.

00-94 PARIS, NATURAL FATHER OF PARIS, ET AL. v. IRON WORKERS TRUST FUND, LOCAL NO. 5 C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 211 F.3d 1265.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 2, 2000
531 U.S. 875 (2000)

finding that a plaintiff in an employment discrimination case must show that the employer's reasons for taking an employment action were dishonest or pretextual, not just dispute the merits of them

Summary of this case from Spriggs v. Public Service Commission of Maryland

discussing this concept in relation to Title VII

Summary of this case from Jadali v. Alamance Regional Medical Center

discussing this concept in relation to Title VII

Summary of this case from Jadali v. Alamance Regional Medical Center
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 2, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 875 (2000)

Citing Cases

People v. Rotella

Mr. Rotella challenges the statute as unconstitutionally vague on its face and as it is applied to him. It is…

Mackie v. Jewish Foundation for Group Homes

In addition, the relevant inquiry is not whether the employer's proffered non-discriminatory reason for the…