From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Dep't of Corr.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan 12, 2022
332 So. 3d 1114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 1D20-1309

01-12-2022

Curtis Lee CARTER, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

Curtis Lee Carter, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Gecelyne S. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Curtis Lee Carter, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Gecelyne S. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The Court denies the petition for writ of certiorari on the merits. See Topps v. State , 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that "clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits" is deemed a decision "which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel").

Rowe, C.J., and Osterhaus and Winokur, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Carter v. Dep't of Corr.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan 12, 2022
332 So. 3d 1114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Carter v. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:Curtis Lee CARTER, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Jan 12, 2022

Citations

332 So. 3d 1114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)