Summary
holding that "[the plaintiff] had a full and fair opportunity to [litigate] by raising the issues . . . in multiple documents submitted during the course of his Article 78 proceeding"
Summary of this case from Franza v. StanfordOpinion
9:05-CV-1427 (LEK/DRH).
January 16, 2008
DECISION AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on November 27, 2007 by the Honorable David R. Homer, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3 of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 38). After ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the entire file to the undersigned, including the objections by Plaintiff John Carroll, which were filed on December 12, 2007. Objections (Dkt. No. 39).
It is the duty of this Court to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). "A [district] judge . . . may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." Id. This Court has considered the objections and has undertaken a de novo review of the record and has determined that the Report-Recommendation should be approved for the reasons stated therein.
Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 38) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further
ORDERED, that Defendant's Second Motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 30) is GRANTED as to all remaining claims and Defendants; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.