From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cannady v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 15, 2000
771 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 2D99-2870.

Opinion filed November 15, 2000.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County; Cynthia A. Ellis, Judge.

Affirmed.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Cynthia J. Dodge, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


The appellant challenges an order revoking community control and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The record in this case supports the trial court's finding that the appellant's violations were willful and substantial. We therefore affirm the revocation. Further, while appeal proceedings are pending in an appellate court, a trial court is without jurisdiction to consider the merits of a motion for postconviction relief made pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Libby v. State, 520 So.2d 322 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). We therefore affirm the denial of the motion for postconviction relief, without prejudice to the appellant again filing the motion after this appeal has become final.

Casanueva and Stringer, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Cannady v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 15, 2000
771 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Cannady v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL TODD CANNADY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 15, 2000

Citations

771 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Snipes v. State

See also Oliver v. State, 734 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (holding that the two-year time limitation of…