From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cala v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 24, 2003
854 So. 2d 840 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 3D02-923.

Opinion filed September 24, 2003.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose Rodriguez, Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 00-13558.

Kenneth P. Speiller, for appellant,

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Barbara Zappi, Assistant Attorney General, (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before COPE, SHEVIN, and WELLS, JJ.


Juan Cala challenges his sentence as a violent career criminal arguing that the non-violent burglaries on which his sentence was based are not qualifying offenses as "described" in section 776.08 of the Florida Statutes. See § 775.084(1)(d), Fla. Stat. (2003) (defining a violent career criminal as a defendant who has previously been convicted as an adult three or more times for an offense that is a "forcible felony, as described in s. 776.08"). According to Cala, section 776.08 enumerates those crimes that may qualify as predicate forcible felonies if and only if they involve the use or threat of physical force or violence. We disagree.

Section 776.08 defines the term forcible felony to mean those crimes expressly enumerated, irrespective of the use or threat of physical force or violence, as well as those crimes not enumerated which involve the use or threat of physical force or violence:

"Forcible felony" means treason; murder; manslaughter; sexual battery; carjacking; home-invasion robbery; robbery; burglary; arson; kidnapping; aggravated assault; aggravated battery; aggravated stalking; aircraft piracy; unlawful throwing, placing, or discharging of a destructive device or bomb; and any other felony which involves the use or threat of physical force or violence against any individual.

§ 776.08, Fla. Stat. (2003) (emphasis added).

As we explained in Rodriguez v. State, 837 So.2d 1177, 1178-79 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), the final clause of section 776.08 looks to the statutory elements of crimes not enumerated, not to the elements of those crimes expressly listed. Thus, a prior conviction for burglary, even for burglary of an unoccupied premises, may qualify as a predicate conviction under section 775.084. See, e.g., Woody v. State, 847 So.2d 566 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (holding that "non-violent burglaries . . . counted as qualifying offenses"); Delsol v. State, 837 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding that non-violent burglaries could be considered forcible felonies under section 775.084 as qualifying offenses); see also Spikes v. State, 28 Fla. L. Weekly D1756 (Fla. 3d DCA July 30, 2003) (confirming that conviction for burglary of an unoccupied conveyance qualifies a defendant as a violent career criminal under section 775.084(1)(c)).

Affirmed.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF.


Summaries of

Cala v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 24, 2003
854 So. 2d 840 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Cala v. State

Case Details

Full title:JUAN CALA, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 24, 2003

Citations

854 So. 2d 840 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Stratis v. State

Affirmed. See Young v. State, 739 So.2d 553 (Fla.1999) ; Zink v. State, 951 So.2d 34 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ;…

Stratis v. State

Affirmed. See Young v. State, 739 So.2d 553 (Fla.1999); Zink v. State, 951 So.2d 34 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Curi…