From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cain v. Kirsch

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sep 21, 2012
96 So. 3d 1161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 1D12–2584.

2012-09-21

Stephen CAIN and Christopher Cain, Petitioner, v. Joel KIRSCH, Respondent.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari–Original Jurisdiction. Brian J. Lee of Schuler & Lee, P.A., Jacksonville, for Petitioner. Jerilynn M. O'Hara and Susan S. Oosting of O'Hara Law Firm, Jacksonville, for Respondent.


Petition for Writ of Certiorari–Original Jurisdiction.
Brian J. Lee of Schuler & Lee, P.A., Jacksonville, for Petitioner. Jerilynn M. O'Hara and Susan S. Oosting of O'Hara Law Firm, Jacksonville, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Jackson v. Computer Sci. Raytheon, 36 So.3d 754, 756 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (stating that court lacks certiorari jurisdiction where irreparable harm is not established).

MARSTILLER, RAY and SWANSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cain v. Kirsch

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sep 21, 2012
96 So. 3d 1161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Cain v. Kirsch

Case Details

Full title:Stephen CAIN and Christopher Cain, Petitioner, v. Joel KIRSCH, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Sep 21, 2012

Citations

96 So. 3d 1161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)