From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Butler v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Jun 20, 1990
790 S.W.2d 661 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990)

Summary

remanding for findings of fact and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of Butler's confession

Summary of this case from Butler v. Davis

Opinion

No. 70745.

June 20, 1990.

Appeal from 185th Judicial District Court, Harris County Carl Walker, Jr., J.

Andrew L. Jefferson, Jr., Houston, for appellant.

John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty., and Winston E. Cochran, Jr., George Lambright, Belinda Hill and Maria Hayes, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the court en banc.

OPINION


Appeal is taken from a conviction for capital murder. V.T.C.A., Penal Code, § 19.03(a)(2). After finding appellant guilty, the jury returned affirmative findings to the special issues submitted to them pursuant to Art. 37.071, V.A.C.C.P. Punishment was assessed at death.

Appellant has filed a brief raising ten points of error. In his sixth point of error, appellant alleges the trial court erred when it failed to file findings of fact and conclusions of law following a hearing in which the trial court denied appellant's motion to suppress several purported confessions. Appellant states this Court is required to abate this appeal and direct the trial court to prepare and file the findings of fact and conclusions of law mandated by Art. 38.22, § 6, V.A.C.C.P. Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, at 783-784 (Tex.Cr.App. 1987), cert. denied 485 U.S. 938, 108 S.Ct. 1117, 99 L.Ed.2d 278 and Harris v. State, 771 S.W.2d 10 (Tex.App. — San Antonio, 1989). In its reply brief, the State agrees with appellant's sixth point of error that this appeal should be abated while the trial court files its findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding appellant's confession. The State argues that an abatement is the most relief that appellant should receive on this point.

This Court orders the appeal in the instant cause be abated. This cause is remanded to the trial court to make the findings of fact and conclusions of law called for by Art. 38.22, § 6, V.A.C.C.P. Following that, the trial court shall promptly forward the properly perfected record to this Court.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Butler v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Jun 20, 1990
790 S.W.2d 661 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990)

remanding for findings of fact and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of Butler's confession

Summary of this case from Butler v. Davis

remanding for findings of fact and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of Butler's confession

Summary of this case from Butler v. Quarterman
Case details for

Butler v. State

Case Details

Full title:Steven Anthony BUTLER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc

Date published: Jun 20, 1990

Citations

790 S.W.2d 661 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Vuong v. State

When the trial judge ruled that Appellant's statement was voluntary, he failed to make the necessary findings…

Dennis v. State

" Id. A long line of Texas Court of Criminal Appeals cases holds that article 38.22, section 6 is mandatory…