From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bush v. Henney

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Oct 7, 2015
175 So. 3d 930 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Summary

holding that the trial court erred in denying a motion to dissolve a domestic violence injunction entered 14 years prior, where the movant had never violated the injunction and its continued existence affected the movant's ability to travel overseas

Summary of this case from Larios v. Larios

Opinion

No. 4D14–3557.

2015-10-7

Michael BUSH, Appellant, v. Wendy HENNEY, Appellee.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Laura M. Watson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 98–13782(42)(91) FMCE. Troy W. Klein of Law Office of Troy W. Klein, West Palm Beach, for appellant. No brief filed for appellee.


Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Laura M. Watson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 98–13782(42)(91) FMCE.
Troy W. Klein of Law Office of Troy W. Klein, West Palm Beach, for appellant. No brief filed for appellee.
GROSS, J.

We reverse the denial of appellant's motion to dissolve a permanent domestic violence injunction after a hearing. The injunction was entered in 2000 and addressed appellant's contact with appellee and their child. Appellant moved to dissolve the injunction in 2014. In the 14 years the injunction remained in effect, appellant never violated it and never tried to contact appellee. Appellant testified that he has no desire or intention of contacting appellee. The child is now 20 years old. As a result of the injunction, appellant has been detained in airports when traveling overseas.

A party to a domestic violence injunction “may move at any time to modify or dissolve the injunction. No specific allegations are required.” § 741.30, Fla. Stat. (2014). The events which gave rise to this injunction arose during an exchange of the parties' minor child. “[T]he scenario underlying the injunction no longer exists so that the continuation of the injunction would serve no valid purpose.” Alkhoury v. Alkhoury, 54 So.3d 641, 642 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); see also Colarusso v. Lupetin, 28 So.3d 238, 239 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

The case is remanded to the circuit court for the entry of an order dissolving the injunction. TAYLOR, J., and SHEPHERD, CAROLINE, Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Bush v. Henney

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Oct 7, 2015
175 So. 3d 930 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

holding that the trial court erred in denying a motion to dissolve a domestic violence injunction entered 14 years prior, where the movant had never violated the injunction and its continued existence affected the movant's ability to travel overseas

Summary of this case from Larios v. Larios

reversing the denial of a motion to dissolve an injunction against domestic violence where, in the fourteen years following entry of the injunction, the injunction had not been violated

Summary of this case from Labrake v. Labrake
Case details for

Bush v. Henney

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BUSH, Appellant, v. WENDY HENNEY, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Oct 7, 2015

Citations

175 So. 3d 930 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

Trice v. Trice

See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1203 (Fla. 1980). In that respect, this case is very close to the…

Noe v. Noe

After considering the testimony of the witnesses, the trial court determined that Appellant's current…