From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burrows v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Mar 3, 2017
219 So. 3d 910 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

holding defendant with concurrent twenty-five-year sentences was entitled to judicial review after twenty years

Summary of this case from Montgomery v. State
See 6 Summaries

Opinion

Case No. 5D15–3478

03-03-2017

Jessy J. BURROWS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Jessy J. Burrows, Arcadia, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Jessy J. Burrows, Arcadia, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Jessy J. Burrows appeals his concurrent twenty-five-year sentences for his numerous non-homicide offenses committed when he was seventeen years old. The State properly concedes that Burrows is entitled to resentencing. See Kelsey v. State , 206 So.3d 5, 8 (Fla. 2016) ("[A]ll juvenile offenders whose sentences meet the standard defined by the Legislature in chapter 2014–220, a sentence longer than twenty years, are entitled to judicial review."). Therefore, we reverse Burrows's sentences and remand for resentencing under chapter 2014–220, Laws of Florida.

REVERSED and REMANDED for Resentencing.

SAWAYA, WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

Burrows v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Mar 3, 2017
219 So. 3d 910 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

holding defendant with concurrent twenty-five-year sentences was entitled to judicial review after twenty years

Summary of this case from Montgomery v. State

reversing concurrent twenty-five-year sentences for nonhomicide offenses

Summary of this case from Pedroza v. State

reversing denial of postconviction relief and remanding for resentencing where juvenile offender received 25-year sentences for non-homicide offenses

Summary of this case from Tillman v. State

reversing denial of postconviction relief and remanding for resentencing where juvenile offender received 25–year sentences for non-homicide offenses

Summary of this case from Hart v. State

reversing denial of postconviction relief and remanding for resentencing where juvenile offender received 25-year sentences for non-homicide offenses

Summary of this case from Tillman v. State

noting that the State properly conceded that Burrows was entitled to resentencing and reversing his twenty-five-year sentences for nonhomicide offenses he committed as a juvenile and remanding for resentencing under chapter 14–220

Summary of this case from Cuevas v. State
Case details for

Burrows v. State

Case Details

Full title:JESSY J. BURROWS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 3, 2017

Citations

219 So. 3d 910 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

Pedroza v. State

Carey Haughwout, President, Maria E. Lauredo, Chief Assistant Public Defender, and Jonathan Greenberg,…

Montgomery v. State

As a result, we held that Peterson's fifty-six-year sentence could not stand under Graham and its progeny,…

24 Citing Cases