From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bullock v. Metropolitan Dade County

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 20, 1983
438 So. 2d 151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 83-147.

September 20, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, William A. Herin, J.

Richard A. Barnett, Hollywood, for appellant.

Robert A. Ginsburg, County Atty., and Ralph C. Rocheteau, III, Asst. County Atty., for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.


Dismissal of plaintiff's action for failure of his attorney to appear for a call of the calendar is too severe a sanction to visit upon a litigant. For derelictions of this nature, a court is empowered to discipline the offending attorney by contempt or other appropriate punishment. See Catogas v. Sapp, 397 So.2d 1182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Aller v. Editorial Planeta, S.A., 389 So.2d 321 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Reversed.


Summaries of

Bullock v. Metropolitan Dade County

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 20, 1983
438 So. 2d 151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Bullock v. Metropolitan Dade County

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES BULLOCK, APPELLANT, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY AND OFFICER…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 20, 1983

Citations

438 So. 2d 151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Arango v. Alvarez

The mere assertion by a party to a lawsuit that he does not comprehend . . . legal obligations . . . does not…

Trujillo v. Gerdes

The dismissal of a plaintiff's claim for failure of his attorney to appear for a call of the calendar is too…