From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bryant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 17, 1992
600 So. 2d 547 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-01655.

June 17, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Susan Sexton, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Tonja R. Vickers, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Davis G. Anderson, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Larry H. Bryant raises two points in this appeal from a judgment and sentence for robbery and aggravated battery. We find no merit in the first point Appellant raises. Appellant's second point is that the trial court erred in delegating its duty of determining the amount of restitution to a nonjudicial officer. O'Conner v. State, 587 So.2d 596 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Perry v. State, 513 So.2d 254 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). The State conceded this was error. We agree, and remand to the trial court to determine the amount of Appellant's restitution.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur.


Summaries of

Bryant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 17, 1992
600 So. 2d 547 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Bryant v. State

Case Details

Full title:LARRY H. BRYANT, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 17, 1992

Citations

600 So. 2d 547 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Woods v. State

The restitution aspect of the order must also be reversed and remanded with instructions to the trial court…

Helton v. State

We agree with the appellant that only the trial court may determine the amount of restitution and it cannot…