From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bryant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 30, 2001
800 So. 2d 692 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 5D01-3269

November 30, 2001

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Anthony Johnson, Judge.

William Kenneth Bryant, Chipley, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.


William Bryant filed a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) to correct an illegal sentence. The defendant attacks his 1989 conviction for escape, asserting that he was not under state confinement when the escape occurred. The trial court denied the motion. We affirm.

The defendant does not have a claim of an illegal sentence but is, in fact, attacking the underlying conviction, which he calls an "erroneous charge." This issue could or should have been raised on direct appeal or in a Rule 3.850 motion. It is not cognizable in a Rule 3.800(a) motion.

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bryant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 30, 2001
800 So. 2d 692 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Bryant v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM KENNETH BRYANT a/k/a WILLIAM K. HOUSTON, Appellant, v. STATE OF…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Nov 30, 2001

Citations

800 So. 2d 692 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

W.P. v. State

Affirmed. See B.H. v. State, 645 So.2d 987 (Fla.1994) ; Register v. State, 619 So.2d 498 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) ;…

Williams v. State

Affirmed. See Safrany v. State, 895 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla.…