From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bryant v. Florida Parole

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 25, 2007
965 So. 2d 825 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Summary

declining to employ tipsy coachman rule

Summary of this case from Bueno v. Workman

Opinion

No. 1D06-5112.

September 25, 2007.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. William L. Gary, Judge.

Dwight L. Bryant, pro se, Appellant.

Kim Fluharty, General Counsel, and Connie Lynn Beach, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Parole Commission, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Because the action of the Florida Parole Commission that was the subject of appellant's petition for writ of mandamus occurred prior to the effective date of section 95.11(5)(0, Florida Statutes, the circuit court erred in concluding that the petition was time-barred under the statute. See Singletary v. Van Meter, 708 So.2d 266 (Fla. 1998); Foley v. Morris, 339 So.2d 215 (Fla. 1976). We decline the Parole Commission's invitation to employ the "tipsy coachman" rule and affirm on grounds that appellant's claim is nonetheless barred by the doctrine of laches. The circuit court made no factual findings concerning the equitable considerations inherent in resolving a laches claim, and it would be inappropriate for us to do so in the context of this appeal.

Accordingly, the order denying appellant's petition for writ of mandamus is reversed and the matter is remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

BROWNING, C.J., BARFIELD and BENTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bryant v. Florida Parole

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 25, 2007
965 So. 2d 825 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

declining to employ tipsy coachman rule

Summary of this case from Bueno v. Workman
Case details for

Bryant v. Florida Parole

Case Details

Full title:Dwight L. BRYANT, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 25, 2007

Citations

965 So. 2d 825 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Tank Tech, Inc. v. Valley Tank Testing, L.L.C.

Thus because the trial court did not have the opportunity to make a factual finding regarding that issue, we…

Pearce v. McNeil

FPC has asserted that petitioner's claim is barred by the doctrine of laches, however, this argument was not…