From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brunetti v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 6, 1992
594 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 1992)

Opinion

No. 78535.

February 6, 1992.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Great Public Importance, Fourth District — Case No. 90-0705 (Broward County).

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Allen J. DeWeese, Asst. Public Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Joan Fowler, Bureau Chief, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., and Jacqueline Barakat, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.


We review Brunetti v. State, 583 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), because, in an unpublished order dated August 22, 1991, the district court granted Brunetti's motion to certify the following question as being of great public importance:

Do Instruction 3.04(c)(2), Florida Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases, and Section 777.201(2), Florida Statutes (1989), both applicable to offenses after 1987, unconstitutionally shift the burden to the defense to prove entrapment?

We recently answered this question in the negative. Herrera v. State, 594 So.2d 275 (Fla. 1992). Therefore, we approve Brunetti.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J. and OVERTON, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

BARKETT, J., concurs in result only.


Summaries of

Brunetti v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 6, 1992
594 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 1992)
Case details for

Brunetti v. State

Case Details

Full title:PETER BRUNETTI, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Feb 6, 1992

Citations

594 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 1992)

Citing Cases

Holiday v. State

Finally, and most importantly, this Court found inSmith that "[t]here was no constitutional infirmity in the…