From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 8, 1984
449 So. 2d 417 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Summary

remanding for nunc pro tunc evaluation when original experts available to testify

Summary of this case from Mason v. State

Opinion

No. 83-1659.

May 8, 1984.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Henry L. Oppenborn, Acting Circuit Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and May L. Cain, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Calvin L. Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.


Upon the authority of State v. Williams, 447 So.2d 356 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), this action is remanded for a hearing to determine the defendant's competency at the time of his trial in May, 1983. At oral argument it was learned that the three psychiatric experts who originally examined the defendant are still available to testify and the hearing should, therefore, contain their testimony as well as other evidence the state or the defense may offer. Should the trial court determine that the defendant's competency in May, 1983, cannot be sufficiently established to protect his due process rights, the trial court should grant a new trial.

Remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 8, 1984
449 So. 2d 417 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

remanding for nunc pro tunc evaluation when original experts available to testify

Summary of this case from Mason v. State

remanding for nunc pro tunc evaluation when original experts were available to testify

Summary of this case from Monte v. State
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN BROWN, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 8, 1984

Citations

449 So. 2d 417 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

State v. Weber

Id. at 983 n. 4. The state argues that, because a formal competency determination at the first trial was…

Rogers v. State

Opinions remanding for trial courts to determine whether a retrospective determination of competency is…