From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 29, 2002
816 So. 2d 1142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 5D01-3692.

April 19, 2002. Rehearing Denied May 29, 2002.

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County, Margaret T. Waller, Judge.

Michael C. Brown, Arcadia, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Brown appeals from the trial court's denial of his post-conviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), in which he seeks jail time credit against his sentence. He alleges he should have been awarded 294 days jail time credit for time spent in jail from December 5, 1997 when he was arrested, to September 25, 1998 when he was sentenced. The trial court denied the credit of time giving as the reason the fact that Brown was not arrested on the escape charge on December 5, 1997, but was picked up on the warrant on March 24, 1998. However, the trial court failed to attach any portion of the record to support its stated reason.

The denial of a defendant's rule 3.800(a) motion when sufficient allegations are made to afford relief, should include not only valid reasons for the denial by the trial court, but also attachments of portions of the record sufficient to support the denial. The rule places on the trial court the obligation to attach sufficient portions of the record to refute the defendant's claim. See Moore v. State, 741 So.2d 577 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999); Bunch v. State, 622 So.2d 525 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the purpose of allowing the trial court to attach sufficient portions of the record to refute Brown's claim for jail time credit. Should the court conclude that the motion cannot be decided on the face of the record, it may deny the motion without prejudice so that Brown may file a rule 3.850 motion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PETERSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 29, 2002
816 So. 2d 1142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL C. BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: May 29, 2002

Citations

816 So. 2d 1142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Wright v. State

The rule places on the trial court the obligation to attach sufficient portions of the record to refute the…

Walsh v. State

The circuit court denied Walsh's 3.800(a) motion without comment. If a defendant alleges that the record…