From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Sep 24, 2001
24564 (Haw. Sep. 24, 2001)

Opinion

24564

September 24, 2001.

MOON, C.J., LEVINSON, NAKAYAMA, RAMIL, and ACOBA, JJ.


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING


ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

By letter dated August 24, 2001, complaining witness Betty Buie Brooks petitions for review of the dismissal of ODC 6731. The dismissal of ODC 6731 is not subject to review. See Rule 2, Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai`i; In re Disciplinary Board, 91 Haw. 363, 368, 984 P.2d 688, 673 (1999) ("Under Rule 2, complaining witnesses are not parties to disciplinary cases and they have no standing under Rule 2 to seek review of ODC or Disciplinary Board decisions"); c f. Akinaka v. Disciplinary Board, 91 Haw. 51, 58, 979 P.2d 1077, 1084 (1999) (complaining witness does not have standing to compel initiation of disciplinary proceedings). It further appears that Petitioner Brooks did not pay a filing fee for submission of her petition. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall file Brooks' request as an original proceeding without prepayment of the filing fee. See HRS 607-3.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Brooks' petition is dismissed.


Summaries of

Brooks v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Sep 24, 2001
24564 (Haw. Sep. 24, 2001)
Case details for

Brooks v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel

Case Details

Full title:BETTY BUIE BROOKS, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL…

Court:Supreme Court of Hawaii

Date published: Sep 24, 2001

Citations

24564 (Haw. Sep. 24, 2001)