From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 20, 1990
559 So. 2d 745 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 87-01738.

April 20, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Harry Lee Coe, III, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Stephen Krosschell, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joseph R. Bryant, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Paul Broner appeals his conviction for grand theft. We reverse.

Broner, a nephew of the alleged victim, obtained access to her home by asking to use the telephone. The aunt thereafter went upstairs for approximately ten minutes. When she returned Broner was gone, the rear door of the residence was unlocked, and a videocassette recorder was missing. A witness saw Broner leave the residence through the rear door, but with nothing in his hands. The VCR was never recovered.

We find that these undisputed facts are, as a matter of law, insufficient to establish that Broner committed the theft. Cf. Jenkins v. State, 342 So.2d 1097 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Accordingly the trial court erred in denying Broner's motion to dismiss.

This case was disposed of below via Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(c)(4).

Reversed and remanded with directions to discharge the appellant.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and PARKER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Broner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 20, 1990
559 So. 2d 745 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Broner v. State

Case Details

Full title:PAUL ELBERT BRONER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 20, 1990

Citations

559 So. 2d 745 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Brown v. State

As there was sufficient evidence to support the grand theft charge, the court did not err in denying the…

State v. E.A

We affirm the trial court's order granting E.A.'s sworn motion to dismiss. Contrary to the state's position,…