From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bridges v. World Service Life Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 30, 1975
134 Ga. App. 923 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

50482.

SUBMITTED APRIL 8, 1975.

DECIDED MAY 30, 1975.

Action on insurance policy. Lowndes Superior Court. Before Judge Calhoun.

Robert L. Cork, for appellant.

McLane, Dover Sherwood, J. Carroll Sherwood, for appellee.


Appellant sued World Service Life Insurance Company under a credit life policy which had been issued to her husband in connection with a debt incurred with the General Motors Acceptance Corporation. Defendant insurer denied liability under the provisions of Code Ann. § 56-2409 (Ga. L. 1960, pp. 289, 660) and filed a motion for summary judgment which was granted. This appeal is from that judgment.

The policy contained a one-line statement signed by insured which read: "I hereby certify that I am in good health as of the effective date above." On that date, September 5, 1972, when this representation of good health was made, the applicant was on furlough as an in-patient from a Florida hospital where he was receiving treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. By interrogatory it had been established that decedent "was informed in 1971 by a military physician in Washington, D.C. that he had incurable leukemia and would live approximately two or more years." (R. 20). Due to this condition the insured died on June 27, 1973, nine months and twelve days from the date when the insured had represented to the insurer that he was in good health.

By affidavit insurer showed that it had relied upon the truthfulness of the representation of good health as submitted by the insured and that if it had been informed of his true condition at that time "such information would have had the effect of increasing the risk so substantially that said company would have been obliged in good faith to refuse to accept the risk, and would not have issued the policy of insurance on the life of the deceased." (R. 35). The premium had been returned voluntarily after insured's death. Held:

1. This case clearly comes within the provisions of Code Ann. § 56-2409. Insured's representation that he was of good health was an incorrect statement. The insurer has established that if the true facts had been known, then it in good faith would not have issued the policy. Accordingly, the trial court was correct in granting the summary judgment motion for the insurer. Code Ann. § 56-2409; Jessup v. Franklin Life Ins. Co., 117 Ga. App. 389 ( 160 S.E.2d 612); Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Perry, 121 Ga. App. 618 ( 174 S.E.2d 570). Even if the applicant had made the representation in good faith, not knowing that it was untrue, the insurer is not liable where, as here, it shows that the representation was false and that it changed the nature, extent, or character of the risk. All American Life c. Co. v. Saunders, 125 Ga. App. 7 ( 186 S.E.2d 328).

2. There is nothing in the record to show that the insurer's agent had knowledge of the falsity of the representation, a point argued in appellant's brief. Accordingly, this assertion cannot be considered as our decision must be made on the facts contained in the record. Airport Associates v. Audioptic Instructional Devices, Inc., 125 Ga. App. 325 ( 187 S.E.2d 567); Maloy v. Dixon, 127 Ga. App. 151 ( 193 S.E.2d 19).

Judgment affirmed. Pannell, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

SUBMITTED APRIL 8, 1975 — DECIDED MAY 30, 1975.


Summaries of

Bridges v. World Service Life Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 30, 1975
134 Ga. App. 923 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

Bridges v. World Service Life Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:BRIDGES v. WORLD SERVICE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 30, 1975

Citations

134 Ga. App. 923 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
216 S.E.2d 714

Citing Cases

United Family Life c. Co. v. Shirley

The Pitts standard for judging the effect of a misrepresentation by the applicant on his application for…

Bourne v. Balboa Insurance Co.

In its answer, the appellee insurer established that the insurance would not have been issued to one who had…