From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brennan v. Fairfield

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jul 6, 2000
755 A.2d 217 (Conn. 2000)

Opinion

Decided July 6, 2000


The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 58 Conn. App. 191 (AC 18969), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Is notice that is received on the ninety-second day under a ninety day notice statute sufficient when the municipal office to which the notice must be sent is closed on the ninetieth and ninety-first days (a Saturday and a Sunday)?

"2. Is notice received by a town clerk invalid when the sending party misnames the individual who is the town clerk?"

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16342.

Brenden P. Leydon, in support of the petition.

Charles W. Fleischmann, in opposition.


Summaries of

Brennan v. Fairfield

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jul 6, 2000
755 A.2d 217 (Conn. 2000)
Case details for

Brennan v. Fairfield

Case Details

Full title:MARY BRENNAN v. TOWN OF FAIRFIELD

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jul 6, 2000

Citations

755 A.2d 217 (Conn. 2000)
254 Conn. 903

Citing Cases

Brennan v. Fairfield

"2. Is notice received by a town clerk invalid when the sending party misnames the individual who is the town…