From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brawner v. Pearl Assurance Company

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 12, 1961
285 F.2d 120 (9th Cir. 1961)

Opinion

No. 16853.

December 6, 1960. Rehearing Denied January 12, 1961.

William H. Brawner and Ernest W. Pitney, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Angus C. McBain, McBain Morgan, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES, HAMLIN and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges.


The sole question on this appeal is whether appellant is entitled to interest on a judgment based upon a loss claimed to fall within appellee's fire insurance policy. There was dispute as to the value of the property insured. The trial court, passing upon conflicting evidence, awarded appellant $7,500. This was a claim "uncertain as to amount due" until the court's decision was made. No interest was due her until the uncertain amount was determined. Appellee was also liable in the undisputed sum of $150 for loss of rental of the premises destroyed by fire. This figure was certain in amount at all times, and undisputed after proof of loss was made. Appellant is entitled to interest at the legal rate of $150 from April 5, 1957 (sixty days after filing proof of loss), until payment. As so modified, the judgment is affirmed. Each side is to bear its costs on appeal.


Summaries of

Brawner v. Pearl Assurance Company

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 12, 1961
285 F.2d 120 (9th Cir. 1961)
Case details for

Brawner v. Pearl Assurance Company

Case Details

Full title:Gertrude L. BRAWNER, Appellant, v. PEARL ASSURANCE COMPANY, Limited…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 12, 1961

Citations

285 F.2d 120 (9th Cir. 1961)

Citing Cases

Granholm v. TFL Exp.

The district court denied prejudgment interest on that balance. The Second Circuit affirmed. Its opinion at…