From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyd v. Walker

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 2, 2001
776 So. 2d 370 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 5D00-1070.

Opinion filed February 2, 2001.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County, A. W. Nichols, III, Judge.

Reversed.

R. Mitchell Prugh of Middleton Prugh, P.A., Melrose, for Appellant.

John F. Sproull, Palatka, for Appellee.


Robert and Patricia Boyd (Boyd) appeal an amended final judgment granting Alton Walker, et al. (the Walkers) a statutory way of necessity over Boyd's real property.

We reverse because the Walkers failed to carry their burden at trial to show that they do not have a common-law way of necessity available to them. See Hancock v. Tipton, 732 So.2d 369, 373 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (declaring that section 704.01(1) and (2), Florida Statutes must be read sequentially). A landowner who has a common-law way of necessity under section 704.01(1) is ineligible for a statutory way of necessity under section 704.01(2). See Reyes v. Perez, 284 So.2d 495 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).

REVERSED.

COBB, PETERSON and PALMER, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Boyd v. Walker

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 2, 2001
776 So. 2d 370 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Boyd v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT T. BOYD AND PATRICIA A. BOYD, Appellant, v. ALTON WALKER AND…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 2, 2001

Citations

776 So. 2d 370 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Cirelli v. Ent

There are two "ways of necessity" recognized in section 704.01: the common law way of necessity described in…