From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowen v. Merlo

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 6, 1978
353 So. 2d 668 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

No. GG-77.

January 6, 1978.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Duval County, Lamar Winegeart, Jr., J.

Ernest D. Jackson, Sr., Jacksonville, for appellant.

Fred M. Johnson, Jacksonville, for appellees.


Appellant contends that the trial court erred in holding as a matter of law that he did not comply with Section 713.18, Florida Statutes, the Mechanics' Lien Law, on grounds that he mailed his claim of lien to the owner by regular mail instead of by certified or registered mail as required by Section 713.18(1)(c). We concur and reverse. It is undisputed that the owner here received actual notice of the claim of lien. We agree with the court in Vitra-Spray of Florida, Inc., v. Gumenick, 144 So.2d 533 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1962) that notice is the important element dealt with by the section. We note in addition that Section 713.18(1)(b) specifically allows the claim to be served by actual delivery and there is no doubt that actual delivery was accomplished here. Continental Home Parks, Inc., v. Golden Triangle Asphalt Paving Co., 291 So.2d 49 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974), cited by Appellees, is distinguishable because there was no allegation there that the proper person ever received notice of the claim.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

McCORD, C.J., and BOYER and MELVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bowen v. Merlo

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 6, 1978
353 So. 2d 668 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Bowen v. Merlo

Case Details

Full title:JOHN BOWEN, D/B/A CROCKETT ASSOCIATES OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. THOMAS J…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jan 6, 1978

Citations

353 So. 2d 668 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Citing Cases

Tim Hortons USA, Inc. v. Singh

Florida appellate courts and Florida federal courts follow the Patry rule. See, e.g., Lazzara Oil Co. v.…

Phoenix Ins. Co. v. McCormick

We will not interpret the statute to permit a denial of coverage upon constructive notice and to preclude…