From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bothke v. Fluor Engineers and Constructors

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 3, 1984
739 F.2d 484 (9th Cir. 1984)

Opinion

No. 81-5457.

August 3, 1984.

Hans Bothke, in pro. per.

Jonathan S. Cohen, John Dudeck, Jr., Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee.

Before WRIGHT, KENNEDY, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Following our opinion in Bothke v. Fluor Engineers, et al. and W.J. Terry, 713 F.2d 1405, certiorari was granted by the Supreme Court, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 3566, 82 L.Ed.2d 867. On July 2, 1984, that Court vacated the judgment and remanded to this court for further consideration in light of Davis v. Scherer, 468 U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 3012, 82 L.Ed.2d 139 (1984).

The cause is now remanded to the district court for the purpose of determining whether Terry is qualifiedly immune in accordance with the standards set forth in Davis v. Scherer.

Unless plaintiff-appellant Bothke can meet the burden of showing a violation of constitutional rights that were clearly established at the time of the conduct at issue, the district court will enter a judgment of dismissal.


Summaries of

Bothke v. Fluor Engineers and Constructors

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 3, 1984
739 F.2d 484 (9th Cir. 1984)
Case details for

Bothke v. Fluor Engineers and Constructors

Case Details

Full title:HANS BOTHKE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FLUOR ENGINEERS AND CONSTRUCTORS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 3, 1984

Citations

739 F.2d 484 (9th Cir. 1984)

Citing Cases

Bothke v. Fluor Engineers Constructors, Inc.

Upon the Supreme Court's remand, we in turn remanded to the district court with instructions to dismiss the…

Maraziti v. First Interstate Bank of Calif

In Davis v. Scherer, 468 U.S. 183, 197, 104 S.Ct. 3012, 3020, 82 L.Ed.2d 139 (1984) ( Davis), the Supreme…