From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bormuth v. Cnty. of Jackson

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Feb 27, 2017
855 F.3d 694 (6th Cir. 2017)

Opinion

No. 15-1869

02-27-2017

Peter Carl BORMUTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF JACKSON, Defendant-Appellee.


ORDER

A member of the en banc court sua sponte requested a poll in this case pursuant to 6 Cir. I.O.P. 35(e). A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en banc of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed, and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.


Summaries of

Bormuth v. Cnty. of Jackson

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Feb 27, 2017
855 F.3d 694 (6th Cir. 2017)
Case details for

Bormuth v. Cnty. of Jackson

Case Details

Full title:Peter Carl BORMUTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF JACKSON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Date published: Feb 27, 2017

Citations

855 F.3d 694 (6th Cir. 2017)

Citing Cases

Fields v. Speaker of the Pa. House of Representatives

And a Sixth Circuit panel held that "[e]xcluding unwanted prayers is discrimination" violative of the…

Bormuth v. Cnty. of Jackson

On appeal, a panel of our court ruled in Bormuth's favor on his Establishment Clause challenge. Bormuth v.…