Bordo v. Bd. of Co. Comr's of Broward

Full title: BORDO, INC., DAVID VINCENT, INC., AND "JOHN DOE", APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF…

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 21, 1994

647 So. 2d 873 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

Nos. 93-2895, 93-2902.

September 9, 1994. Opinion Denying Post-Decision Motions but Certifying Question December 21, 1994.

Consolidated appeals of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Harry G. Hinckley, Jr., Judge.

Daniel R. Aaronson and James S. Benjamin, Benjamin Aaronson, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants Bordo, Inc., David Vincent, Inc. and "John Doe".

David A. Wasserman, Casselberry, for appellants DMH, Inc. and "John Doe".

John J. Copelan, Jr., County Atty., and Anthony C. Musto and Christine M. Duignan, Asst. County Attys., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees Bd. of County Com'rs of Broward County.

Robin S. Richards, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Ron Cochran, Sheriff.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Marc E. Brandes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Hollywood, for appellee Michael Satz, State Atty.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See 3299 N. Federal Highway, Inc. v. Board of County Comm'rs, 646 So.2d 215 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.

ON POST-DECISION MOTIONS

We deny all of appellants' post-decision motions but certify as one of great public importance the same question we similarly certified in 3299 N. Federal Highway, Inc. v. Board of County Comm'rs, 646 So.2d 215 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.