From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Mar 28, 1991
926 F.2d 1573 (11th Cir. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-8898.

March 28, 1991.

Carl R. Woodward, III, Carella, Byrne, Bain, Gilfillan, Cecchi Stewart, Roseland, N.J. and Peter J. Anderson, Peterson, Dillard, Young Self Asselin, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Duross Fitzpatrick, District Judge.

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, DUBINA, Circuit Judge, and HENDERSON, Senior Circuit Judge.


The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of the district court's dispositive opinion, which is reported as Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc., 745 F. Supp. 710 (M.D.Ga. 1990).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Mar 28, 1991
926 F.2d 1573 (11th Cir. 1991)
Case details for

Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:OLIVER M. BOND AND HERTA R. BOND, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. OCTAGON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Mar 28, 1991

Citations

926 F.2d 1573 (11th Cir. 1991)

Citing Cases

Vermeulen v. Renault, U.S.A. Inc.

Both the Georgia courts and federal courts applying Georgia law have construed the Georgia long-arm statute,…

Vermeulen v. Renault U.S.A., Inc.

Both the Georgia courts and federal courts applying Georgia law have construed the Georgia long-arm statute,…