From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blickenstaff v. Blickenstaff

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Jul 5, 1929
167 N.E. 146 (Ind. Ct. App. 1929)

Opinion

No. 13,485.

Filed July 5, 1929.

HUSBAND AND WIFE — Wife's Action Against Husband — For Husband's Negligence. — A wife cannot maintain an action against her husband for personal injuries caused by his negligence.

From Wabash Circuit Court; Frank O. Switzer, Judge.

Action by Carrie Dell Blickenstaff against her husband, Melroy Blickenstaff, for damages for personal injuries resulting from his negligence. From a judgment for the defendant on his demurrer to the complaint, the plaintiff appealed. Affirmed. By the court in banc.

John F. Kelton, Fred H. Bowers, Milo Feightner and Lee M. Bowers, for appellant.

Walter S. Bent, for appellee.


Complaint by appellant against her husband for damages for injuries sustained in an automobile accident received while riding with her husband.

The demurrer was correctly sustained to the complaint for the reason that a married woman cannot sue her husband for personal injuries caused by his negligence. Henneger v. Lomas (1896), 145 Ind. 287, 289, 44 N.E. 462, 32 L.R.A. 848; Schubert v. Schubert Wagon Co. (1928), 249 N.Y. 253, 164 N.E. 42; Thompson v. Thompson (1910), 218 U.S. 611, 31 Sup. Ct. 111, 54 L.Ed. 1180, 30 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1153; Austin v. Austin (1924), 136 Miss. 61, 100 So. 591, 33 A.L.R. 1388; Perlman v. Brooklyn City R. Co. (1921), 117 Misc. Rep. 353, 191 N.Y. Supp. 891; Heyman v. Heyman (1917), 19 Ga. App. 634, 92 S.E. 25; Peters v. Peters (1909), 156 Cal. 32, 103 P. 319, 23 L.R.A. (N.S.) 699; Woltman v. Woltman (1922), 153 Minn. 217, 189 N.W. 1022.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Blickenstaff v. Blickenstaff

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Jul 5, 1929
167 N.E. 146 (Ind. Ct. App. 1929)
Case details for

Blickenstaff v. Blickenstaff

Case Details

Full title:BLICKENSTAFF v. BLICKENSTAFF

Court:Court of Appeals of Indiana

Date published: Jul 5, 1929

Citations

167 N.E. 146 (Ind. Ct. App. 1929)
167 N.E. 146

Citing Cases

Staats v. Transit Co.

In other states, the married women's statutes there in effect have been generally held not to abolish the…

Pickens v. Pickens

Perhaps the first case to apply the immunity doctrine in a personal tort action was that of Henneger v. Lomas…