From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blaustein v. Harrison

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 14, 1981
286 S.E.2d 758 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)

Summary

holding that the renewal statute was inapplicable in suits where the original filing was in federal court and that this holding is not unconstitutional as it is based on Georgia Supreme Court precedent

Summary of this case from Lau v. Klinger

Opinion

62569.

DECIDED OCTOBER 14, 1981 REHEARING DENIED OCTOBER 30, 1981

Medical malpractice. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Cooper.

Robert John White, for appellant.

Robert G. Tanner, for appellee.


This medical malpractice action was initially field in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, where it was dismissed for lack of diversity jurisdiction. Within six months of this dismissal, but more than two years after accrual of the cause of action, the plaintiff refiled the suit in the Superior Court of Fulton County. The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendant based on the running of statute of limitation (Code Ann. § 3-1102; Ga. L. 1976, pp. 1363, 1364). The plaintiff appeals, contending that she was authorized under Code Ann. § 3-808 to refile the suit within six months of the dismissal in federal court. Held:

Code Ann. § 3-808 (as amended through Ga. L. 1967, pp. 226, 244) provides as follows: "If a plaintiff shall discontinue or dismiss his case, and shall recommence within six months, such renewed case shall stand upon the same footing, as to limitation, with the original case; but this privilege of dismissal and renewal shall be exercised only once under this section." It has been held repeatedly that this rule does not apply where the original filing is in federal court. See Henson v. Columbus Bank c. Co., 144 Ga. App. 80 (4) ( 240 S.E.2d 284) (1977), and cases cited therein. We reject the plaintiff's contention that such an interpretation of the statute is unconstitutional, given that it is based upon Supreme Court precedent. See, e.g., Constitution Pub. Co. v. DeLaughter, 95 Ga. 17 ( 21 S.E. 1000) (1894); Webb v. Southern Cotton Oil Co., 131 Ga. 682 ( 63 S.E. 135) (1908).

Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

DECIDED OCTOBER 14, 1981 — REHEARING DENIED OCTOBER 30, 1981 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.


Summaries of

Blaustein v. Harrison

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 14, 1981
286 S.E.2d 758 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)

holding that the renewal statute was inapplicable in suits where the original filing was in federal court and that this holding is not unconstitutional as it is based on Georgia Supreme Court precedent

Summary of this case from Lau v. Klinger

holding that former section 9-2-61 did not apply when the original filing was in federal court

Summary of this case from Waldrop v. Evans
Case details for

Blaustein v. Harrison

Case Details

Full title:BLAUSTEIN v. HARRISON

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Oct 14, 1981

Citations

286 S.E.2d 758 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)
286 S.E.2d 758

Citing Cases

Waldrop v. Evans

This amendment effectively overruled the portion of those cases which were decided prior to the enactment of…

O'Neal v. DeKalb County, Ga.

1986). Although the section was at one time ruled as inapplicable to actions which originated in federal…