Opinion
No. 74176.
February 15, 1990.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Great Public Importance, Second District — Case Nos. 88-01349, 88-01353, 88-01354, 88-01356, 88-01357, 88-01359, 88-01419, 88-01421, 88-01430, 88-01431, 88-01432, 88-01433, 88-01553, 88-01554, 88-01555, 88-01557, 88-01559, 88-01560, 88-01602, 88-01694, 88-01715, 88-01716, 88-01799 and 88-01801.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Lawrence D. Shearer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for petitioners.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and David R. Gemmer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.
We have for review Blankenship v. State, 545 So.2d 908, 908 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), to answer the following certified question:
DOES SECTION 893.13, FLORIDA STATUTES (1987) VIOLATE THE ONE SUBJECT RULE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?
We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have answered this question in the negative in Burch v. State, 558 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1990). We approve the decision below.
It is so ordered.
EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.