From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blanchfield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Feb 12, 2015
157 So. 3d 483 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 5D14–3126.

2015-02-12

Brian BLANCHFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

3.801 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, R. Michael Hutcheson, Judge. Brian Blanchfield, Century, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport and Marjorie Vincent–Tripp, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


3.801 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, R. Michael Hutcheson, Judge.
Brian Blanchfield, Century, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport and Marjorie Vincent–Tripp, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Brian Blanchfield appeals from the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801 motion for jail credit. The State properly concedes error because the trial court did not attach portions of the record that conclusively demonstrate that Blanchfield was not entitled to relief. See Romine v. State, 151 So.3d 553 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (requiring trial court to grant additional jail credit or attach records that conclusively demonstrate appellant was not entitled to relief).

REVERSED and REMANDED. ORFINGER, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Blanchfield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Feb 12, 2015
157 So. 3d 483 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Blanchfield v. State

Case Details

Full title:Brian BLANCHFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Feb 12, 2015

Citations

157 So. 3d 483 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

Shepman v. State

Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions that the postconviction court either grant Shepman the six…

Adkins v. State

If Adkins is able to file a legally sufficient Rule 3.801 motion, at that point the trial court should…