From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Black v. First Nat. Bank of Brooksville

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Feb 20, 1929
97 Fla. 19 (Fla. 1929)

Opinion

Opinion filed February 20, 1929. Decision filed July 22, 1927. Petition for rehearing granted November 14, 1927.

A writ of error to the Circuit Court for Hernando County; W. S. Bullock, Judge.

Hampton Green, for Plaintiff in Error;

Mabry, Reaves Carlton and Whitehurst Whitehurst, for Defendants in Error.


This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

WHITFIELD, P. J. AND TERRELL AND BUFORD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Black v. First Nat. Bank of Brooksville

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Feb 20, 1929
97 Fla. 19 (Fla. 1929)
Case details for

Black v. First Nat. Bank of Brooksville

Case Details

Full title:CALVIN O. BLACK, Plaintiff in Error, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division B

Date published: Feb 20, 1929

Citations

97 Fla. 19 (Fla. 1929)
119 So. 521
114 So. 458

Citing Cases

State ex rel. Attorney General v. City of Avon Park

If an Act incorporating or adding territory to a municipality, is invalid in whole or in severable part…

Scott v. Nat. City Bk. of Tampa

The purpose of the statute as amended is to state the law of this State to be that a "person or corporation"…