From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bishop v. Lamkin

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 6, 1966
146 S.E.2d 769 (Ga. 1966)

Opinion

23241.

ARGUED DECEMBER 13, 1965.

DECIDED JANUARY 6, 1966.

Injunction. Columbia Superior Court. Before Judge Killebrew.

Thurmond, Hester, Jolles McElmurray, Cornelius B. Thurmond, Jr., for plaintiff in error.

Randall Evans, Jr., contra.


Since bills of exceptions have been abolished under the Appellate Practice Act of 1965 ( Code Ann. § 6-801; Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 20), and this case clearly was appealed after the effective date of that Act as set forth in Section 24 (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 40) thereof, the writ of error here is dismissed. Code Ann. § 6-904 (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 32). However, no examination was made of the record to determine whether such case may have met all requirements of the new procedure Act, supra, because the companion case Bishop v. Lamkin, 221 Ga. 687, ante, was by appeal and seemingly raised all grounds of error raised in this bill of exceptions.

Writ of error dismissed. All the Justices concur.

ARGUED DECEMBER 13, 1965 — DECIDED JANUARY 6, 1966.


Summaries of

Bishop v. Lamkin

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 6, 1966
146 S.E.2d 769 (Ga. 1966)
Case details for

Bishop v. Lamkin

Case Details

Full title:BISHOP et al. v. LAMKIN

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Jan 6, 1966

Citations

146 S.E.2d 769 (Ga. 1966)
146 S.E.2d 769

Citing Cases

Undisclosed LLC v. State

In 1965, the General Assembly enacted the Appellate Practice Act ("the Act"). Ga. L. 1965, p. 18. The Act…