Summary
considering the situation "where the third party received the information, in the home of the consumer, after receiving a warning that the information is intended only for the consumer"
Summary of this case from Davis v. Phelan Hallinan & Diamond, Pc.Opinion
Case No. 08-60660-CIV-DIMITROULEAS/ROSENBAUM.
December 31, 2008
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant's Motion to Compel Disclosure Under Rule 26 and Motion for Sanctions Under Rule 37 [D.E. 28]. In view of Defendant's Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Compel Disclosure and for Appropriate Sanctions [D.E. 33], which states that the parties have resolved the issue that constituted the subject of Defendant's Motion to Compel Disclosure and Motion for Sanctions [D.E. 28], it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion to Compel Disclosure Under Rule 26 and Motion for Sanctions Under Rule 37 [D.E. 28] is DENIED AS MOOT.