From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. U.S.

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division
Feb 8, 2008
CASE NO. 4:07cv506-SPM/WCS (N.D. Fla. Feb. 8, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:07cv506-SPM/WCS.

February 8, 2008


ORDER


THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Petitioner's "Motion to Consider Additional Authority Motion to Transfer Case" (doc. 8). Having considered Petitioner's arguments, the Court finds no reason to change its ruling that Petitioner cannot maintain a habeas petition on behalf of other prisoners and that this Court lacks jurisdiction over Petitioner's own habeas claim. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation was issued in accordance with Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(B). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the "Motion to Consider Additional Authority Motion to Transfer Case" (doc. 8) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bell v. U.S.

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division
Feb 8, 2008
CASE NO. 4:07cv506-SPM/WCS (N.D. Fla. Feb. 8, 2008)
Case details for

Bell v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES DALTON BELL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division

Date published: Feb 8, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 4:07cv506-SPM/WCS (N.D. Fla. Feb. 8, 2008)

Citing Cases

Crawley v. Paskert-Johnson Company

A June 11, 2008, "Suggestion of Bankruptcy" (Doc. 11) states that on June 1, 2007, Paskert Distribution…

Crawley v. Paskert-Johnson Company

However, pro se parties are inadequate to represent a class and unlicensed to represent anyone. See, e.g.,…