From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 20, 2001
787 So. 2d 120 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Summary

denying petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel without prejudice to appellant's right to file a rule 3.800 motion challenging his sentence in the trial court

Summary of this case from Burks v. State

Opinion

No. 2D00-2640.

Opinion filed April 20, 2001. Rehearing Denied May 17, 2001.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).

Anthony Bell, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Diana K. Bock, Tampa, for Respondent.


This is an original petition for writ of habeas corpus which we treat as a petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c). In the petition, Anthony Bell contends that his counsel was ineffective in the prior direct appeal to this court in which his conviction for armed robbery and the sentences imposed were affirmed. Bell v. State, 740 So.2d 536 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (table opinion). We deny the petition without prejudice to Bell's right to apply for relief in the trial court with a motion to correct sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).

We conclude that there is no merit to Bell's first and second grounds for relief. Bell's third claim, however, challenges his concurrent equal sentences as a prison releasee reoffender and a habitual felony offender. Such sentences are not authorized. Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655, 659 (Fla. 2000). Bell's appellate counsel's failure to anticipate the Florida Supreme Court's ruling in Grant does not constitute an "omission of such magnitude" that it "deviated from the norm or fell outside the range of professionally acceptable performance."Johnson v. Wainwright, 463 So.2d 207, 209 (Fla. 1985). Bell's remedy cannot be by way of an original petition pursuant to rule 9.141(c) on the theory that appellate counsel was ineffective, but instead must be by way of a motion to correct sentence under rule 3.800(a).

Petition denied without prejudice to Bell's right to file a rule 3.800(a) motion in the trial court.

BLUE, A.C.J., and DAVIS, J., Concur.


Summaries of

Bell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 20, 2001
787 So. 2d 120 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

denying petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel without prejudice to appellant's right to file a rule 3.800 motion challenging his sentence in the trial court

Summary of this case from Burks v. State
Case details for

Bell v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY BELL, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 20, 2001

Citations

787 So. 2d 120 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Jones v. Crosby

Counsel is not required to be prescient. See also Ross v. State, 796 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…

Burks v. State

PER CURIAM.DENIED. SeeBell v. State , 787 So.2d 120 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (denying petition alleging ineffective…