From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Kelly

Supreme Court of the United States
May 12, 2008
553 U.S. 1031 (2008)

Summary

granting certiorari on question of whether § 2254(d) applies to a claim predicated on evidence the state court refused to consider and that was properly received for the first time in an evidentiary hearing on federal habeas

Summary of this case from Gonzalez v. Wong

Opinion

No. 07–1223.

2008-05-12

Edward Nathaniel BELL, petitioner, v. Loretta K. KELLY, Warden.


Case below, 260 Fed.Appx. 599.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.


Summaries of

Bell v. Kelly

Supreme Court of the United States
May 12, 2008
553 U.S. 1031 (2008)

granting certiorari on question of whether § 2254(d) applies to a claim predicated on evidence the state court refused to consider and that was properly received for the first time in an evidentiary hearing on federal habeas

Summary of this case from Gonzalez v. Wong

granting certiorari to decide issue of whether Circuit Court erred in applying § 2254(d) to claim predicated on evidence of prejudice the state court refused to consider and that was properly received for the first time in a federal evidentiary hearing

Summary of this case from Barco v. Tilton
Case details for

Bell v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:Edward Nathaniel BELL, petitioner, v. Loretta K. KELLY, Warden.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: May 12, 2008

Citations

553 U.S. 1031 (2008)
128 S. Ct. 2108
171 L. Ed. 2d 228
76 U.S.L.W. 3529

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Workman

Valdez v. Cockrell, 274 F.3d 941, 953-54 (5th Cir. 2001). The Supreme Court recently granted certiorari to…

Hawkins v. Coyle

In reaching this conclusion, we are mindful that the Supreme Court recently granted a writ of certiorari to…