From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Belin v. Sanchez

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 28, 1958
101 So. 2d 64 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)

Opinion

No. 57-302.

February 27, 1958. Rehearing Denied March 28, 1958.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Vincent C. Giblin, J.

Jepeway Dauber, Miami, for appellant.

David Drucker, Miami, for appellee.


The trial court awarded the plaintiff in this bastardy action a judgment in the amount prescribed in the statute (Chapter 742, F.S.A.) and substantial attorneys' fees. Both awards are before us on appeal.

The learned chancellor saw and observed all these people (neither party having requested a jury trial — Sec. 742.031, F.S.A.) and concluded that the evidence was legally sufficient to prove that the defendant was the father of the child. There was competent, substantial evidence in the record to sustain him — and he did not misconstrue its legal effect. The award to the plaintiff is therefore affirmed.

The cross assignment of error questioning the sufficiency of the award of attorneys' fees is without merit. We hold the award was sufficient for the services rendered.

Affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C.J., and HORTON, J., concur.


Summaries of

Belin v. Sanchez

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 28, 1958
101 So. 2d 64 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)
Case details for

Belin v. Sanchez

Case Details

Full title:MAX BELIN, APPELLANT, v. CARMEN SANCHEZ, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 28, 1958

Citations

101 So. 2d 64 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)

Citing Cases

Young v. Turner

The evidence is sufficient to support the findings and conclusions of the trial court and therefore his final…

Knauer v. Barnett

In such proceedings factual proof of biological paternity is of paramount importance, as is clearly reflected…