From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barrell v. Gibson

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 27, 1980
153 Ga. App. 621 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980)

Summary

In Barrell v. Gibson, 266 S.E.2d 308 (Ga.App. 1980), the Court of Appeals of Georgia affirmed the trial court's denial of the plaintiff's motion for default judgment, holding in a terse opinion that a short, signed letter from the defendant denying the debt alleged in the plaintiff's complaint was sufficient to constitute a general denial.

Summary of this case from Brown v. American Messenger Services, Inc.

Opinion

58962.

SUBMITTED OCTOBER 31, 1979.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 27, 1980.

Action on loan. DeKalb State Court. Before Judge Smith.

Kevin S. King, Janet L. Haynes, for appellant.

P. A. Gibson, pro se.


Barrell, appellant, sued appellee Gibson to recover the amount of an alleged loan. The complaint was brief and alleged only jurisdiction, the debt, its nonpayment and a paragraph seeking attorney fees.

The appellee appeared pro se by a short, signed letter denying the indebtedness. Appellant moved for default judgment claiming the appellee's letter was an improper answer. The letter, while not in the legal form of an answer, constituted a general denial and was adequate. Tahamtan v. Dixie Ornamental Iron Co., 143 Ga. App. 561 ( 239 S.E.2d 217) (1977). The judge correctly denied appellant's motion.

The judge then heard the case without a jury. The evidence was in sharp conflict. The appellant contended the money advanced was a loan; the appellee claimed the monies advanced were to be considered preincorporation expense and were not to be repaid if sufficient expense money was collected for this purpose. The judge found that a reasonable sum for this purpose was collected. The judge resolved the conflict of evidence in favor of the appellee/defendant and entered judgment for appellee.

A judge hearing a case without a jury acts in its stead in fact finding. His judgment will not be disturbed if there is any evidence in the record to sustain it. McDaniel Printing Co. v. Ben Meadows Co., 144 Ga. App. 419 ( 241 S.E.2d 58) (1977); Azar v. Accurate Const. Co., 146 Ga. App. 326 ( 246 S.E.2d 381) (1978).

Judgment affirmed. McMurray, P. J., and Banke, J., concur.


SUBMITTED OCTOBER 31, 1979 — DECIDED FEBRUARY 27, 1980.


Summaries of

Barrell v. Gibson

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 27, 1980
153 Ga. App. 621 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980)

In Barrell v. Gibson, 266 S.E.2d 308 (Ga.App. 1980), the Court of Appeals of Georgia affirmed the trial court's denial of the plaintiff's motion for default judgment, holding in a terse opinion that a short, signed letter from the defendant denying the debt alleged in the plaintiff's complaint was sufficient to constitute a general denial.

Summary of this case from Brown v. American Messenger Services, Inc.
Case details for

Barrell v. Gibson

Case Details

Full title:BARRELL v. GIBSON

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 27, 1980

Citations

153 Ga. App. 621 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980)
266 S.E.2d 308

Citing Cases

Henderson v. Cam Development Co.

"The `any evidence' rule applies in cases where the trial judge acts as the fact finder, and his judgment…

Hatch v. Hatch

See Glenco-Belvedere Animal Hosp. v. Winters, 129 Ga. App. 621 ( 200 SE2d 506) (1973) (appearance card…